Best Hiring Practices for FP&A Teams to Support Company Growth

May 7, 2026
Thought Leadership
Subsribe to our Newsletter: Bridging the Deficit

Weekly Expert Insights on Financial Planning and Strategy

Hiring for FP&A is a different challenge than it was five years ago. The role has expanded from number-crunching and variance reporting into business partnership, scenario modeling, data storytelling, and increasingly, AI-informed analysis. For growing companies, getting these hires right doesn't just affect finance—it affects the quality of strategic decisions across the organization.

Here are the hiring practices that help growing companies build FP&A teams capable of supporting the business at its current complexity—and the complexity it's growing into.

Hire for Business Partnership, Not Just Technical Skill

The most consequential shift in FP&A hiring is the move from purely technical profiles to business partners who happen to have financial skills. Workday's research on the CFO's evolving role describes FP&A professionals as "strategic navigators" who need to combine financial acumen with business understanding, communication skills, and technology fluency.

In practical terms, this means your interview process should evaluate not just modeling ability but the candidate's capacity to explain what the numbers mean to a non-finance audience, ask the right questions about operational dynamics, and connect financial analysis to business decisions. The best FP&A hires are the ones department heads actually want to work with—not just the ones who build the most sophisticated models.

Structure Roles Around the Business, Not the Spreadsheet

In many growing companies, FP&A roles are structured around the planning process: "you do the budget, you do the forecast, you do the variance report." This creates specialists in process steps—not in business insight.

The better approach: structure FP&A roles around business units or functional areas. One analyst partners with sales and revenue teams. Another owns workforce planning and partners with HR. A third handles operational planning with manufacturing or services. Each analyst develops deep business context that makes their financial analysis more relevant and actionable.

This structure also makes the CFO's job easier. Instead of assembling insights from process-oriented analysts, they receive business-contextualized analysis from partners who understand the operational drivers behind the numbers. The CFO can then synthesize these into the strategic narrative the CEO and board need.

Your Tools Directly Affect Your Talent

Here's a hiring reality that many growing companies underestimate: your FP&A tools directly affect the quality of talent you can attract and retain.

A 2024 study found that 94% of business spreadsheets contain errors. Talented FP&A professionals—the ones who can do business partnership, scenario design, and data storytelling—don't want to spend their days debugging VLOOKUP errors and manually consolidating spreadsheets. They'll accept a lower title at a company with modern tools over a higher title at a company where they're buried in manual data work.

The FP&A Trends Survey found that 30% of organizations haven't upgraded their planning systems in five years. For those companies, the talent problem isn't just about hiring—it's about retention. Modern planning infrastructure is both a productivity tool and a recruitment advantage.

Onboarding for Speed to Value

Growing companies need new FP&A hires to contribute quickly. The onboarding process should be designed to get them productive within their first month—not their first quarter.

When the planning platform is well-structured—with clear model documentation, automated data flows, and visible relationships between assumptions and outcomes—a new hire can understand the financial architecture quickly. Compare this to inheriting a predecessor's spreadsheet model: weeks of archaeological work tracing formulas, understanding linked files, and reverse-engineering undocumented logic.

Platform-based planning dramatically reduces onboarding time because the model is transparent by design. Any qualified team member can navigate it. This also reduces key-person risk—when your financial planning infrastructure survives personnel changes, every team member becomes more valuable and less irreplaceable.

Planning for the Team You'll Need Next Year

Growing companies should always be planning one hire ahead. If you're at two FP&A people today and expect to cross $100M in revenue within 18 months, start defining the next role now. What capability gap will emerge? Will it be business unit partnership? Workforce planning depth? Board reporting support?

Use your own workforce planning tools to model the FP&A team's growth trajectory—including the cost implications of each new hire, the timeline, and the expected impact on finance team capacity. It's a useful exercise that also demonstrates the value of the planning infrastructure you've invested in.

Timing Your Hires with Business Milestones

Growing companies should align FP&A hiring with complexity milestones—not just headcount or revenue thresholds. The moments that typically trigger the need for additional FP&A capacity include crossing three or more entities (consolidation demands increase significantly), preparing for a funding round or acquisition (investor-grade projections and due diligence support), moving from annual budgeting to rolling forecasts (the continuous planning cadence requires dedicated analytical capacity), and expanding into new markets or geographies (each new market adds modeling complexity).

Using your own headcount forecasting tools to model FP&A team growth—with specific roles, salary ranges, and planned start dates—gives the CFO a clear picture of the investment and timeline. It also demonstrates the value of the planning infrastructure: you're using the same tools to plan the finance team that you use to plan the business.

The Bottom Line

The best FP&A hiring practices for growing companies combine business-oriented role design, skills-first evaluation, modern tool investment, and intentional sequencing. The companies that get this right build finance teams that don't just keep up with growth—they help drive it. For more on the infrastructure that supports these teams, see our guide to must-have features in FP&A software.

  • Error message label
  • Error message label
  • Error message label
Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.

Stay in the loop!

Sign up for our newsletter to stay up to date with everything Centage.

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Latest posts

Keep reading...

Interviews, tips, guides, industry best practices, and news.

View all Resources